"Lockers have developed in a regulatory vacuum"

“Lockers have developed in a regulatory vacuum”

These distributors cover very diverse realities. Can we speak of the same phenomenon between craftsmen and lockers Large brands?

These are two logics, two distinct philosophies of the rural world. On the one hand, local actors – often farmers, craftsmen or traders – using lockers to maintain their offer, as close as possible to the inhabitants. On the other, large groups like Amazon or World Relay, deploying a national, dematerialized strategy, most often registered in peri -urban areas.

But in the long term, this form of trade is not likely to dehumanize the countryside more?

The customer values ​​above all the practical side of these distributors, who also make people cross people at certain times. When the lockers are designed locally, they support an existing business: it is an “in addition to” service. Conversely, certain devices are essential “instead of” the surrounding commercial offer, without consultation. Today, nothing prevents an installation from coming to compete with a local business directly.

So the State does not have the means to supervise these devices?

They have largely developed in a regulatory vacuum. Their installation – in a parking lot, a sidewalk or on the edge of the field – was made without real development reflection. This vagueness has facilitated their rapid boom, but their multiplication now questions their long -term impact, especially in front of local shops which are subject to much more strict constraints. Which instantly raises the question of competition.

Similar Posts